Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
43% Yes |
57% No |
43% Yes |
57% No |
See how support for each position on “Lab Grown Meat” has changed over time for 3.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Lab Grown Meat” has changed over time for 3.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MRFP831wk1W
Yes, but when the meat is sold it should be required to disclose that it is lab grown as well as undergo several chemical tests.
@9MQ8Z961wk1W
Yes, but only after extensive testing has been performed and verified in a triple blind study performed by an independent org that is verifiably not bought out by a party of interest.
@9N2WC4X5 days5D
No, we already have enough health issues due to human altering of food sources. We need to get back to the basics in our country.
@9N2N5F45 days5D
No, the current meat industry is sufficient enough in providing food. We don't need any new alternatives right now.
@9MMZWFR2wks2W
no because that can make us sick and our odys can change
@9MMZ7PD2wks2W
It depends on how the meat was made. If the meat is safe to eat then they can regulate it.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
