From there, we can define a pregnancy as involving two living parties, both equally deserving of bodily agency. If you would not end another person's life after birth, neither should you end one in utero. Pro-Choice arguments often revolve around bodily autonomy and the immense societal stigma/difficulty of raising a child in the world today. Their arguments have some worth, indeed, but policies should not be focused on the right to terminate a pregnancy. Rather, the government should focus on pro-life policies that take effect after birth, e.g. government subsidized childcare, widely available free diapers, greater tax incentives for adoption, etc.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.