Try the political quiz

219 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How comfortable are you with the idea of the government having a say in the content available on social media platforms?

 @9KLVK76 from Alabama answered…2mos2MO

I don't think the government should control what content we can and can't see.

 @9KLVZLN from North Carolina commented…2mos2MO

I don't think they should have control over it unless someone is without a doubt in sighting violence

 @9KM3GJSIndependence from California agreed…2mos2MO

I believe that the content itself isn’t an inherently bad thing, but if it’s shady, suspicious, or anything illegal or potentially harmful to people of young ages it should be regulated.

 @9KLW7HW from Missouri answered…2mos2MO

The government should not have a say in what content is available to us on social media. While I understand that terrible and illegal things can be posted, there is a moderation team. There is no need for the government to have a say in what happens.

 @9KM4J79Libertarian  from Texas agreed…2mos2MO

Although media needs regulation, I do not trust government agendas to not affect what content they restrict.

 @9KLVM4F from Texas answered…2mos2MO

I believe the government should regulate some of the media

 @9KLY8XR from California disagreed…2mos2MO

The first amendment is literally about freedom of speech, and if the government silences specific voices, would they be better than the enemies we're supposed to hate?

 @9KLVQ88Republican from Oklahoma answered…2mos2MO

Very unfair to have gov Interference with anything that is someone’s opinion and conviction - it should t happen - I stay Meir away form these platforms because of this issue :

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Do you feel your opinions are better heard and addressed by private sector customer service or government-run services?

 @9KHPZTZ from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

Private sector customer service just from my own experience I feel there is less waiting.

 @9KJYNZF from Michigan disagreed…2mos2MO

The government has to focus on the needs of so many people, that there's very little chance that they can care for your needs

 @9KHQCZT from Virginia answered…2mos2MO

Customer service shouldn't determine, influence, or agree with your opinions. Its a business.

 @9KHPS6P from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

 @9KHP4RQ from Arkansas answered…2mos2MO

I feel like a mixed economy is the way to go and parts of socialism and capitalism should be vital parts of the economy

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would your perspective on environmental conservation change if it were entirely driven by non-governmental organizations?

 @9KYGB6D from California answered…2mos2MO

I would be excited if private organizations cared enough to do environmental conservation., but I don't think it would be enough, and the government needs to set regulations to help private organizations so they can better make a change.

 @9KYRJLY from Tennessee agreed…2mos2MO

Elected officials always say that they will do something about climate change, but then when they are elected nothing seems to be done about it. We need people who actually care about the planet and the people on it.

 @9KYGGX3 from Michigan answered…2mos2MO

It would change my perspective not a ton because I feel like people are the cause of most environmental issues and the government should not be responsible for people's actions.

 @9KYGDSMIndependence from California answered…2mos2MO

I would think that the government should be able to assist with environmental conservation mainly because they have the resources to protect the environment, along with nourishing it, and making sure poaching is taken down.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How important is net neutrality to you, and should its enforcement be a government or private sector responsibility?

 @9LJ3ZZ7 from Tennessee answered…1mo1MO

anything concerning the economy should be strictly regulated by the government, any company could easily raise prices to a cruel or unusual amount, at least if its governed by a government we could have say in it being a democracy and such.

 @9LJ3RNN from California answered…1mo1MO

I think that a mixed economy is the best of both worlds and net neutrality is important to have.

 @9LJ3QVGanswered…1mo1MO

It's best for everyone to strive to be their best and want to make the world a better place.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you had to volunteer or donate, would you choose a private charity or a public welfare program?

 @9HTMB9C from Minnesota commented…4mos4MO

I would choose a private charity that is very reputable, it decreases the chances of embezzlement.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can you envision a successful society that operates without any form of government intervention in the economy?

 @9HT9WT3 from Minnesota answered…4mos4MO

I don't think that our society could be economically successful without the intervention of the government because they make laws in which our economy has grown exponentially.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Would you support higher taxes if it meant improving societal safety nets in a mixed economy, and why does that align with your values?

 @9HCTVFC from California answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How does the thought of higher education being solely a government service versus a market-based one influence your views on its quality and accessibility?

 @9KMD7ST from California answered…2mos2MO

 @9KLZ6ZB from California answered…2mos2MO

Our education that being higher or lower should almost never be government controlled or produced.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

During a natural disaster, how do you perceive the roles of the government versus private entities in managing relief efforts?

 @9J4C34H from North Carolina answered…4mos4MO

To he government has to step in and control the situation. No price gouging!

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If disaster relief were solely in the hands of private organizations, what concerns would you have about equity and access?

 @9L54VBZGreen from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

 @9L54LWDLibertarian from New Jersey answered…2mos2MO

I would be concerned that only the private organizations interests would be given the aid needed in a disaster

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How would it affect your community if the government stopped maintaining roads and it became the responsibility of private companies?

 @9JQKRZYPeace and Freedom from California answered…3mos3MO

it allows more people with freedom and some people who has freedom will take that for granted and maybe one day decide to go on a killing spree you never know so if they stom maintaining this people around the world can go insaine

 @9JQKPSQ from Utah answered…3mos3MO

Nobody would end up paying for it, as the companies would likely upcharge it pretty high.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

What's your viewpoint on the obligations of companies to contribute to social welfare in the absence of government mandates?

 @9KYGFQS from New Hampshire answered…2mos2MO

I think the government should help with social welfare instead of companies

 @9KYGFGPWomen’s Equality from California answered…2mos2MO

Yes because companies should always have a code of ethics regardless whether the government is involved or not

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What concerns might arise if your personal data was entirely in the hands of private companies rather than regulated by the government?

 @9JBJP36Democrat from Wisconsin answered…4mos4MO

 @9JBJL5D from Utah answered…4mos4MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think the arts should be left to survive on the market alone or deserve public funding to thrive and be accessible?

 @9JS2LSQ from Tennessee answered…3mos3MO

They should be funded, but make sure that the use that funding for the right reasons.

 @9JRB644 from Florida answered…3mos3MO

I think as long as people care about the arts people will fund them themselves, so I think it should remain the same

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...